Full resolution (JPEG) - On this page / på denna sida - Arbitration - Neutrality
<< prev. page << föreg. sida << >> nästa sida >> next page >>
Below is the raw OCR text
from the above scanned image.
Do you see an error? Proofread the page now!
Här nedan syns maskintolkade texten från faksimilbilden ovan.
Ser du något fel? Korrekturläs sidan nu!
This page has been proofread at least once.
(diff)
(history)
Denna sida har korrekturlästs minst en gång.
(skillnad)
(historik)
beyond what hostile or neutral powers had any
ground for requesting. The Imperial decree
not only charged its military and civil officers
to follow strictly the injunctions of the
proclamation, but Sardinian and French vessels,
which lay moored in Austrian waters, were
also to be permitted to load freight and
proceed to foreign seas, on condition that they
took on board no contraband of war or
prohibited goods of any description. Immediately
on the outbreak of war, the same principles
were adopted by France and Sardinia. These
States, however, went a step further than
Austria, inasmuch as they unreservedly
declared that they would not regard coal as a
contraband of war.
During the Dano-German War, in 1864,
and the war between Austria and Prussia and
Italy, in 1866, the international principles of
maritime law received a similarly wide
interpretation.
During the North American Civil War
important questions came up, which more or less
affected the principle of neutrality. The
question, which became one of the greatest
importance, arose in respect of the injury which
<< prev. page << föreg. sida << >> nästa sida >> next page >>
