Full resolution (JPEG) - On this page / på denna sida - The Prospects
<< prev. page << föreg. sida << >> nästa sida >> next page >>
Below is the raw OCR text
from the above scanned image.
Do you see an error? Proofread the page now!
Här nedan syns maskintolkade texten från faksimilbilden ovan.
Ser du något fel? Korrekturläs sidan nu!
This page has been proofread at least once.
(diff)
(history)
Denna sida har korrekturlästs minst en gång.
(skillnad)
(historik)
wherein proofs were conspicuous by their
absence, and the narrow circle of thought was
filled with scorn and slighting talk about “pious
notions,” etc., the High Chamber threw out the
bill by fifty-six votes against four.
In the Second Chamber the debate was
opened by the Foreign Minister with a speech
which clearly enough justifies the “Memorial
diplomatique” where it points to the necessity
of the study of the arbitration-system having
a high place amongst the requirements made
of those who enter the path of
diplomacy;—a thing that they have actually begun seriously
to set before themselves in England.
In full accord with the evidence brought
forward above, the judicial professor of the
Chamber declared in short that the Chamber
would disgrace itself by adopting the
resolution before it.
After the mover of the resolution and some
who shared his views had expressed their hope
that the Chamber would not fall back from the
position it took in 1874 upon this question, a
speaker rose who requires to be met, Herr A.
Hedin.
He began with the assertion that if a refusal
<< prev. page << föreg. sida << >> nästa sida >> next page >>
