- Project Runeberg -  The History of the Swedes /
vi

(1845) Author: Erik Gustaf Geijer Translator: John Hall Turner
Table of Contents / Innehåll | << Previous | Next >>
  Project Runeberg | Catalog | Recent Changes | Donate | Comments? |   

Full resolution (JPEG) - On this page / på denna sida - Translator's introduction

scanned image

<< prev. page << föreg. sida <<     >> nästa sida >> next page >>


Below is the raw OCR text from the above scanned image. Do you see an error? Proofread the page now!
Här nedan syns maskintolkade texten från faksimilbilden ovan. Ser du något fel? Korrekturläs sidan nu!

This page has been proofread at least once. (diff) (history)
Denna sida har korrekturlästs minst en gång. (skillnad) (historik)

themselves, than from the illustration they throw on the origin and progress of the various nations
that compose this great family of mankind. In the sacred books of the Icelandic Scalds, which record
the mythological lore of northern heathenism, we may find no consistent or satisfactory system of
doctrine, but many speculations, that must be regarded as most ingenious and profound, when we
consider the age and circumstances in which they were produced; and we trace uumistakeably the germs
of the later Teutonic poetry, the dawnings of that intellect which expanded into the radiance of so bright
a day in England under Elizabeth, in Germany almost within our own generation. From the same
authorities we derive the only full and credible account of the religious belief of our own Pagan ancestors,
those wild worshippers of Odin, who poured into Britain, dispossessed its Celtic population, and occupied
its fair domain; where their descendants were to build up an empire bearing sway over the East and
the West, to give laws to distant people and unexplored continents. For in the wide extent of
Scandinavia Proper, on the coasts of the North Sea and the islands of the Baltic, not less than in the
forests of north Germany and Jutland, we must seek for the incunabula gentis Anglicæ [1]. Again, in the
venerable precepts of the Scandinavian legislators, we find the best comments on the principles of our
own jurisprudence; for on this foundation has been reared the vast fabric of English law. In like
mode, their social and military institutes, their habits and manners, elucidate those of the so-called
Anglo-Saxons, and are identical with those of the Danes (so our old writers term them) whose
marauding hosts afterwards came to reinforce their numbers and dispute their heritage; and with those
of the Normans, who wrested from the crown of France some of its noblest provinces, and would not be
satisfied until they had established their power among their insular kinsmen, by the armed bands of the
Conqueror and his followers. In the primitive forms of the Gothic monarchy, when the king speaks to
the assembly of the armed people, or the estates confer with each other at the diet, we discover the
sources from which the usages of the modern constitution of England, familiar to us in its daily workings,
have sprung. And even in the Sweden of the present day, we see perhaps a picture not unlike what
England might have presented, had not the progress of the Anglo-Saxons been arrested, and their
peculiar civilization disturbed, by the admixture of foreign elements. For while Scandinavia has sent
forth in ancient days hosts of emigrants and conquerors, she herself has never received a foreign yoke.
The basis of society there is the “allodial right of property acquired by labour, for Swedish soil was
never won by conquest. Even the old legend of the immigration of Odin and the Asae, speaks of
peaceful colonization, not of forcible subjection. War has certainly had but too great an influence on
the Swedish cultivator, but the law of arms has never divided his land, nor made him a labourer under
foreign dominion [2].” During the middle age also, the Swedes, unlike the Germans, clung to the
traditions and habitudes of their ancestral freedom, and refused to surrender their liberties into the
keeping of princes and nobles; and hence the institutions of this cognate people, like our own, though
under very different conditions, reached their natural development in a free polity. Even as the seed
sown in autumn,—“beautiful type of a higher hope,”—survives the storms of winter, its vitality covered,
but not extinguished, by the snow.

In this view—and perusal of the following pages will show that it is neither forced nor exaggerated—it
would be difficult to point out any country which has more solid or legitimate claims on the attention


[1] The share which the Scandinavians must have had in the Saxon colonization of England, though passed over by
many of our historians from their defective information, seems as clearly established as we can reasonably expect. Danes
(Danai) and Jutes, as well as Rugini (no doubt the classical Rugii or inhabitants of the island of Rügen, and the coast of the
adjacent mainland), are mentioned along with the Saxons proper by Bede. See Hist. i. 15; v. 10. Now the appellation Jutes
is merely another form of that of the Goths; Jutar and Götar, or Gütar, are almost identical in sound; and the Jutes who
occupied the Cimbric Chersonese, and gave their name to it, are supposed to have come from Swedish Göthland. This view
derives countenance from the authority of Gibbon; for it had not escaped the sagacity of that greatest of historians. “This
contracted territory,” he says in Chap. XXV. of the Decline and Fall, “was incapable of pouring forth the inexhaustible
swarms of Saxons, who reigned over the ocean, who filled the British island with their language, their laws, and their
colonies.... The solution of this difficulty is easily derived from the similar manners and loose constitution of the tribes
of Germany; which were blended with each other by the slightest accidents of war or friendship.... It should seem
probable, however, that the most numerous auxiliaries of the Saxons were furnished by the nations who dwelt along the
shores of the Baltic. They possessed arms and ships, the arts of navigation, and the habits of naval war; but the difficulty
of issuing through the northern columns of Hercules (which during several months of the year are obstructed with ice)
confined their skill and courage within the limits of a spacious lake.” (Of this latter assertion, it is to be observed, that there
is no proof; and compare Geijer, Chap. II. ad init. for notices on this subject.) “The rumour of the successful armaments
which sailed from the mouth of the Elbe, would soon provoke them to cross the narrow isthmus of Sleswig, and to launch
their vessels on the great sea. The various troops of pirates and adventurers, who fought under the same standard, were
insensibly united in a permanent society, at first of rapine, and afterwards of government.” Scarcely consistent with this
just and penetrating strain of reflection is another sentence soon after following, which is rather incautiously expressed:
“The fabulous colonies of Egyptians and Trojans, of Scandinavians and Spaniards, which flattered the pride, and amused
the credulity of our rude ancestors, have insensibly vanished in the light of science and philosophy.”
[2] Geijer, Poor Laws, Essay V.

<< prev. page << föreg. sida <<     >> nästa sida >> next page >>


Project Runeberg, Sun Dec 10 07:08:34 2023 (aronsson) (diff) (history) (download) << Previous Next >>
https://runeberg.org/histswed/0016.html

Valid HTML 4.0! All our files are DRM-free