- Project Runeberg -  Svensk botanisk tidskrift / Band 6. 1912 /
638

Table of Contents / Innehåll | << Previous | Next >>
  Project Runeberg | Catalog | Recent Changes | Donate | Comments? |   

Full resolution (JPEG) - On this page / på denna sida - Sidor ...

scanned image

<< prev. page << föreg. sida <<     >> nästa sida >> next page >>


Below is the raw OCR text from the above scanned image. Do you see an error? Proofread the page now!
Här nedan syns maskintolkade texten från faksimilbilden ovan. Ser du något fel? Korrekturläs sidan nu!

This page has never been proofread. / Denna sida har aldrig korrekturlästs.

(33’8

gine etiam in statu sicco non vel parum incurvo), postice latissimus
et crassissimus (11 —18 cm. in tangentiali, 5—9 cm. in verticali et
8—10 cm. in radiali directione) in superficie villoso-scruposus,
azonus, albus; pori subregulares, distincti, albi, dein sensim
rose-oli vel incarnati et demum in fungo exsiccato sordidi, subfusci;
ca ro libroso-carnosa, succosa, subzonata, alba vel leviter
roseo-in-carnata in statu sicco luteola; sapor substipticus; odor haud
no-tabilis; sporæ hyalinæ, ellipsoideæ vel ovatæ, rectæ vel obliquæ,
1-guttatæ, 4—5 x 3^.

Ad truncum vivum Populi tremulæ in insula Asken prope
Furusund 14 Augusti 1912.

Polyporus annosus.

As well known Trametes radiciperda is generali}7 considered
iden-tical with Pol. annosus. It should be noted, however, that at least
tbe original description of Pol. annosus (Syst. Myc. I p. 373) seems
to agree better with Pol. ungulatus (Pol. marginatus). The
Statement »Ad traneus Betulae» suggests also such interpretation and is
not compatible with Tram. radiciperda, which never is found ön
Betula as far as I know. The size »3 unc. crassus» in quite
in-consistent with Tram. radiciperda even if we suppose that »3» is a
misprint for »1», and the word »fere» seems to exclude the
possi-bility that »unc.» be a misprint for »lin.». I doubt also that
any-one has ever found the reflexed part of Tram. radiciperda up to
»4 unc.» broad.

Polyporus incarnatus.

What this name respects seems doubtful. With exception of the
word »glaber» the description agrees with the species so named
by Karsten of which Rostkovius has given a good figure under
the name Pol. hæmatodus. But this figure is cited by Fries under
another name (Pol. rufus) and his own figure (t. 189. fig. 1) seems
to represent a different species, viz. Pol. rixosus (also called Pol.
collabens and Pol. emollitus etc.). Fiues’ Statement in Hym. Eur.
»margo superior passim reflexus» agrees well with Pol.
hæmatodus. The surface of said reflexed margin is puzzlingly like that
of Pol. dichrous, though tliese species are certainly distinct. In old
specimens the pores often become blackish and in such State the
plant has sometimes been considered as a separate species (PoL

<< prev. page << föreg. sida <<     >> nästa sida >> next page >>


Project Runeberg, Mon Dec 11 23:00:10 2023 (aronsson) (download) << Previous Next >>
https://runeberg.org/svbotan/6/0728.html

Valid HTML 4.0! All our files are DRM-free