Full resolution (JPEG) - On this page / på denna sida - Sidor ...
<< prev. page << föreg. sida << >> nästa sida >> next page >>
Below is the raw OCR text
from the above scanned image.
Do you see an error? Proofread the page now!
Här nedan syns maskintolkade texten från faksimilbilden ovan.
Ser du något fel? Korrekturläs sidan nu!
This page has never been proofread. / Denna sida har aldrig korrekturlästs.
below. C. CLAUS wrote in 1876, p. 94, of this linib that it „seine fußähnliehe Form erhalten
hat“. If by this statement C. CLAUS meant that this limb had retained a number of primitive
characteristics, he has certainly committed a fundamental mistake. This limb is undoubtedlv
Fig. IV. — The fifth limb; according to „the first method of explanation“. t. Polycope frequens G. W. Mülle«.
2. Sarsiella capsula A. M. Norman. 3. Cypridina mediterranea O. Costa, juvenis; from bohind. i. The same limb from
before. 5. Asterope oblonga Grube. 6. Conchoccia. 7. Macrocypris. 8. Cylherella sordida G. W. Müller J. (Figs. I.
3, 4, 6 and 8 from G. W. Müller, 1894; figs. 3, 4 and (5 are somewhat modified. Figs. 2 and 5 from G. O. Suis. iss".
no. 5 is somewhat modified. Fig. 7 is drawn by me from nature.)
to be regarded as very much modified. This far-reaching modification and the total lack of
known transitional forms makes any attempt at homologization merely a caprice, at worsf
obviously incorrect, at hest unverifiable,
<< prev. page << föreg. sida << >> nästa sida >> next page >>
