Note: Gunnar Myrdal died in 1987, less than 70 years ago. Therefore, this work is protected by copyright, restricting your legal rights to reproduce it. However, you are welcome to view it on screen, as you do now. Read more about copyright.
Full resolution (TIFF) - On this page / på denna sida - VIII. Social Stratification - 31. Caste and Class - 2. The “Meaning” of the Concepts “Caste” and “Class” - 3. The Caste Struggle
<< prev. page << föreg. sida << >> nästa sida >> next page >>
Below is the raw OCR text
from the above scanned image.
Do you see an error? Proofread the page now!
Här nedan syns maskintolkade texten från faksimilbilden ovan.
Ser du något fel? Korrekturläs sidan nu!
This page has never been proofread. / Denna sida har aldrig korrekturlästs.
676 An American Dilemma
social class structure is dimly intellectualized by the general public—^in
spite of much observance in actual life of small and big status differences
—
this is not quite so true.*
The actual class stratification differs much between different communities.
This is particularly true between rural and urban communities, between
communities in the different historical regions of the country, and between
the white and Negro castes. Different class divisions for each of these would
be appropriate. If for convenience’s sake the same scale of division is being
used, this should not lead us to exaggerate the similarity between the dif-
ferent class structures.** What is regarded as the upper class in one com-
munity or caste, for example, would not be regarded as upper class in
another community or caste, even if community associations and caste marks
were changed,
3. The Caste Struggle
The Marxian concept of “class struggle’’—with its basic idea of a class
of proletarian workers who are kept together in a close bond of solidarity
of interests against a superior class of capitalist employers owning and con-
trolling the means of production, between which there is a middle class
bound to disappear as the grain is ground between two millstones—is in all
Western countries a superficial and erroneous notion. It minimizes the
distinctions that exist within each of the two main groups j
it exaggerates
the cleft between them, and, especially, the consciousness of it; and it
misrepresents the role and the development of the middle classes. It is
“too simple and sweeping to fit the facts of the class-system.”^^ In America
it is made still more inapplicable by the traversing systems of color caste.
The concept of “caste struggle,” on the other hand, is much more realistic.
Archer talked of a “state of war” between Negroes and whites in the
United States James Weldon Johnson spoke about “the tremendous
struggle which is going on between the races in the South.”^® The caste
<< prev. page << föreg. sida << >> nästa sida >> next page >>